|
Security
forces in Nepal
The
police headquarters, while responding to a Supreme
Court order, has admitted to torturing junior
officers in the guise of taking departmental action.
This treatment conflicts with the government’s
obligations under the Convention Against Torture, as
well as violates the Constitution. In a written
explanation to the apex court, the police
headquarters, by referring to the provision of
Clause 9 (4) of the Police Act 2012 BS, said that it
has the right to take departmental action against
junior officers by resorting to ‘minor physical
torture’ to maintain discipline. A month ago, an
advocate had filed a writ petition seeking the court
order to nullify the Act’s provision. Forms of
torture against junior officers include making them
carry heavy loads and submerging them in water for
long periods.
The higher-ups have the authority to take disciplinary action, so vital to the
proper functioning of the police force. But torture is unacceptable, whether of
the minor or extreme kind. There are many ways in which proper punishment could
be meted out to the guilty. Torture is inhuman and abominable in any civilised
society. Not only in the security forces, but everywhere else should it be
shunned.
In civilised societies, it is illegal to take physical action against anyone,
leave alone torturing them. Even the parents do not have the right to slap their
own children as it violates their human rights. Torture — like bribery and
poison — is harmful. It causes physical and mental harm to its victims. But
torture is widely reported to have been a handy tool of the security forces in
Nepal. If junior officers can be tortured, what may happen to the members of the
public in police custody is anybody’s guess. There is an urgent need to
sensitise the police force and other security agencies to the need to respect
the human rights of every citizen, however low he or she may be in society. The
rule of law must be supreme. And the guilty must be brought to justice, and in
criminal cases, mere departmental action is not enough. |
|